<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.codeplex.com/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Test Case Generator</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/project/feeds/rss</link><description>Generator for test cases based on euquivalence class analysis and combination of states. This tool is basically a wrapper for the PICT-Tool by Microsoft &amp;#40;a tool for Pairwise Independent Combinatorial Testing&amp;#41;. So the tool itself is not included but can be downloaded from http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;download.microsoft.com&amp;#47;download&amp;#47;f&amp;#47;5&amp;#47;5&amp;#47;f55484df-8494-48fa-8dbd-8c6f76cc014b&amp;#47;pict33.msi. For simple scenarios the built in bute force combinatorial algorithm may be enough for your use.   The Generator is built to target .NET 2.0 at the moment, using Visual Studio 2008.</description><item><title>Source code checked in, #85696</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/85696</link><description>Branched from &amp;#36;&amp;#47;TestCaseGenerator&amp;#47;Workingversion</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:55:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #85696 20120124065545A</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #85695</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/85695</link><description>Created setup installer for Test Case Generator&amp;#13;&amp;#10;</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:55:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #85695 20120124065507A</guid></item><item><title>Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/19035</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Some bug fixes in PICT - Integration.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;New: Now a setup is available!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="ClearBoth"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:52:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012) 20120124065231A</guid></item><item><title>Released: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/19035</link><description>
&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Some bug fixes in PICT - Integration.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;New: Now a setup is available!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><author></author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:52:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Released: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012) 20120124065231A</guid></item><item><title>Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/19035</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Some bug fixes in PICT - Integration.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;New: Now a setup is available!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="ClearBoth"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:52:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012) 20120124065210A</guid></item><item><title>Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/19035</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;Some bug fixes in PICT - Integration.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="ClearBoth"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Updated Release: 1.4.0.0 (Jan 23, 2012) 20120124063414A</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #82034</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/82034</link><description>Incremented Version to 1.4.0.0</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:01:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #82034 20111027060130A</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Errournous result when using commas in parameter values using PICT as a generator [16801]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/workitem/16801</link><description>&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Resolved with changeset 82033.</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:59:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Errournous result when using commas in parameter values using PICT as a generator [16801] 20111027055925A</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #82033</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/82033</link><description></description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:59:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #82033 20111027055921A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Errournous result when using commas in parameter values using PICT as a generator [16801]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/workitem/16801</link><description>&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:45:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Errournous result when using commas in parameter values using PICT as a generator [16801] 20111027054511A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Limite usability of “Test cases matching this condition are obsolete” with pairwise testing [11281]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/workitem/11281</link><description>This option is to much dangerous and must not be use with pairwise&amp;#40;or n-wise&amp;#41; combination because it remove pairs.  It can be usefull when All combination generator is selected. But when PICT generator is selected we should use PICT constraints to generate that kind of results.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: rameshramani ** &lt;p&gt;I completely agree&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rameshramani</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:11:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Limite usability of “Test cases matching this condition are obsolete” with pairwise testing [11281] 20110204121129P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Request for ability to use PICT constraints when generating test cases [5773]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/workitem/5773</link><description>In PICT models, it is possible to define constraints for the cases which are generated.&lt;br /&gt;i.e. &amp;#40;from the PICT users guide&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;File system&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;FAT&amp;#34;   THEN &amp;#91;Size&amp;#93; &amp;#60;&amp;#61; 4096&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;File system&amp;#93; in &amp;#123;&amp;#34;FAT&amp;#34;, &amp;#34;FAT32&amp;#34;&amp;#125;   THEN &amp;#91;Compression&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Off&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is incredibly helpful when generating test cases where there are various constraints and interdependencies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Our products are capable of measuring spectra and waveforms. In both cases we can specify the number of averages but if you want to use averaging with waveforms then you have to enable the tachometer. Thus, an example constraint that we would use with PICT is&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;spec&amp;#47;wfm&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Waveform&amp;#34; AND &amp;#91;averages&amp;#93; &amp;#60;&amp;#62; 1 THEN &amp;#91;tachometer&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;On&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is just a very basic example... configuring a basic spectrum&amp;#47;waveform measurement on our instruments can involve setting 12 or more parameters and there are several dependencies there &amp;#40;i.e. you can use an accelerometer sensor for Acceleration, Velocity and Displacement measurements but you can&amp;#39;t use a displacement sensor for Acceleration or Velocity&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;sensor&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Accelerometer&amp;#34; THEN &amp;#91;units&amp;#93; IN &amp;#123;&amp;#34;Accel&amp;#34;, &amp;#34;Vel&amp;#34;, &amp;#34;Displ&amp;#34;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;sensor&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Velocity&amp;#34; THEN &amp;#91;units&amp;#93; IN &amp;#123;&amp;#34;Vel&amp;#34;, &amp;#34;Displ&amp;#34;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;IF &amp;#91;sensor&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Displacement&amp;#34; THEN &amp;#91;units&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#34;Displ&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For us, we&amp;#39;re wanting to generate a number of test cases to try different combinations of settings but the actual number of possible results &amp;#40;of interest&amp;#41; is very low... either the measurement is successful and the values measured are correct, or it fails.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: rameshramani ** &lt;p&gt;I think we should also implement the option of &amp;#91;col1&amp;#93;&amp;#60;&amp;#62;&amp;#91;col2&amp;#93; to avoid duplicate values between 2 fields when i provide this option, I get error message.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>rameshramani</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:09:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Request for ability to use PICT constraints when generating test cases [5773] 20110204120946P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #64713</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/64713</link><description>Changed project formats to VS2010</description><author>mbulmahn</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:53:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #64713 20101202035331P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #57274</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/57274</link><description>Checked in by server upgrade</description><author>_TFSSERVICE</author><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:13:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #57274 20100728101323P</guid></item><item><title>Reviewed: 1.3.0.0 (六月 20, 2010)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/11372#ReviewBy-huangrubing</link><description>Rated 5 Stars &amp;#40;out of 5&amp;#41; - utill now, it has been perfect.</description><author>huangrubing</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:11:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Reviewed: 1.3.0.0 (六月 20, 2010) 20100621021108A</guid></item><item><title>Reviewed: 1.3.0.0 (六月 20, 2010)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/11372#ReviewBy-huangrubing</link><description>Rated 5 Stars &amp;#40;out of 5&amp;#41; - utill now, i has been perfect.</description><author>huangrubing</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:09:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Reviewed: 1.3.0.0 (六月 20, 2010) 20100621020949A</guid></item><item><title>Reviewed: 1.2.0.0 (févr. 25, 2010)</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/releases/view/8718#ReviewBy-lahous</link><description>Rated 5 Stars &amp;#40;out of 5&amp;#41; - Excelent, you did a great job&amp;#33;&amp;#10;</description><author>lahous</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:08:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Reviewed: 1.2.0.0 (févr. 25, 2010) 20100225040842P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Ability to use PICT Weighting [11279]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=11279</link><description>Add option to weight parameters when we use Pict integration.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: charle001 ** &lt;p&gt;It is already working. ..We just have to add some values in parenthesis and it works. Just document this &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; feature ine the pdf.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>charle001</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:25:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Ability to use PICT Weighting [11279] 20091221072555P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Limite usability of “Test cases matching this condition are obsolete” with pairwise testing [11281]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=11281</link><description>This option is to much dangerous and must not be use with pairwise&amp;#40;or n-wise&amp;#41; combination because it remove pairs.  It can be usefull when All combination generator is selected. But when PICT generator is selected we should use PICT constraints to generate that kind of results.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>charle001</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:42:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Limite usability of “Test cases matching this condition are obsolete” with pairwise testing [11281] 20091221064216P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Ability to use PICT Sub-model [11280]</title><link>http://testcasegenerator.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=11280</link><description>Be able to higher order for some more important parameters&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>charle001</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:08:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Ability to use PICT Sub-model [11280] 20091221060809P</guid></item></channel></rss>
